To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Cookies may be used for personalisation of ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Posted by 
Delighted to see that one person who read that article clicked the “sad” emoji by way of review.
I don’t understand the people who voted “Indifferent”. If you at least browsed through and cared enough to click, you’re not really indifferent, are you? Bloody nincompoops.
I voted Indifferent, btw. Just because.
It seems appropriate that people voted indifferent for that one though.
Secretly hoping that it gets more votes than anything else we’ve written and that it’s a landslide for indifferent. What would that mean?
That there’s a large portion of your readership that is fiercely nonchalant.
Conspicuous indifference is very on-brand for this website
We’d take a team of players averaging 30 at the moment.
The giddy heights of 600 every match!
Did you not see the bowling attack you’d end up with?
Cricket captain 2018 has Bess and Tom Curran as unstoppable forces who take turns at number 1 in the rankings.
In the basis of no evidence, cc 2019 revoked this.
In other news, over on Wisden Cricket Weekly Cricketer Spotted…
…whooaahh. An veritable outbreak of Co-op spottings. Is this plausible? Can you really visualise Dan Christian in the Co-op?
As for even suggesting Dawid Malan in Londis. Come. Off. It.