To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Cookies may be used for personalisation of ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Stuart Broad says that “in Test cricket, you need eight or nine guys to have a really good game, in T20 you need two or three max”.
This may be the stupidest thing ever said by a cricketer.
“Max”
Indeed. In T20, you want one guy to have a really good game, and eight or nine guys to not suck.
When was the last time an England player had a really good game in T20?
Loving the channeling of Kurt Vonnegut in a cricket context. I think you’ve done that before, haven’t you?
More than once. It’s like a literary tic.
Genius.
You won’t believe how England can win the World T20! Here are six amazing reasons!
LOL
I’ve never much liked the acronym “LOL”, but have discovered a way to tolerate it. Instead of “laugh out loud”, one substitutes “lots of lager”. You will find that it works semantically in most cases.
When it doesn’t work, you can treat it as an instruction, or assume that the user of said acronym is informing you of the nature of their most recent repast.
The comments on Cricinfo from people that have clearly taken something like this as a serious article never cease to make me smile.
Looking ahead, after the World T20 has endeth:
… and here are Six reasons (and one bonus reason!) why England DID NOT win the World T20.
1. did not have momentum
2. were predictable
3. too many players in excellent/poor form
4. too many bowling options, but no strike bowlers
5. Bopara’s batting letdown
6. you can write off this team!
7. KP (who else?)
6 reasons will be the 6 different variations jade bowls to win the whole thing when restricting whoever we play in the final, to 3 in the final over when they only needed 5 to win.
Inky Jade MBE.
That bit about Bopara not aborting his run-up.
The day you returned from your big shop without the chicken, did you demolish a Nandos instead, KC? Or what?
Please stop sparing us these vital details.
No, we made a second shop and then made something that was actually quite akin to a Nandos. We then obliterated it – by which we mean that we ate it.