Posted by 
You’ll have noticed that the site’s been a bit quiet this week and we’re afraid it’ll continue to be quiet throughout this Test.
Sorry about that, but we’re figuratively tied up at the minute. Can you talk amongst yourselves until we’re back?
Preview-wise, this Test will be another without Jimmy Anderson. We wrote about that once and we still feel exactly the same.
Jimmy’s absence is becoming a more common thing and we can only presume that he’s deliberately trying to soften the blow of his eventual departure by phasing himself out. Very thoughtful of him.
On the upside, cricket is a little kinder than life because every sad departure necessarily brings with it an uplifting new arrival.
Okay, Jimmy’s not actually departed the game quite yet, and technically Mark Wood’s not a new arrival, but you get what we’re driving at: the sadness is immediately offset, even if it can never be negated.
We all have favourite players, but the numeric nature of a first XI means there’s a certain one-in/one-out rejuvenation that distracts from unhelpful rumination on the vast, incomprehensible relentlessness of time and one’s own fleeting appearance within it.
So this week’s fresh growth is, appropriately enough, Wood. In truth, he is not so green. He was 30 this week, but 30’s pretty young these days – look at the man he’s replacing for proof of that.
We’re almost always in favour of picking Mark Wood for reasons explained in this Mark Wood v Chris Woakes piece (which seems to have done some Dorian Grey, doodle-in-the-loft type deal itself).
The short version is: whenever you have a choice between a player who is possibly electrifying and one who definitely is not electrifying, you should always pick the possibly electrifying one. This applies even if there’s a more than reasonable chance he won’t perform as well as the other guy.
There’s a lot of getting by in life, so you might as well seek out and embrace the memorable highs.
Similar deliveries:
Test cricket is what Mark Wood wants to play – but even if he’s keen enough and fit enough, modern cricket won’t allow him to do so
Should England play Chris Woakes or Mark Wood?
Let us tell you about Mark Wood from England’s World Cup squad
Frankly, you might as well open the bowling with Mark Wood
All true. But I feel a bit of a scrub for being pleased that Woakes has been passed over. I really like Chris Woakes, possibly more than his objective worth warrants and I feel he deserves better of me.
“So this week’s fresh growth is, appropriately enough, Wood. In truth, he is not so green. ”
Wonderful & deliberate over-use of the metaphor.
I too like Chris Woakes, but it is hard to over-metaphor his name in the same way as Wood.
I suppose this is leading me down the road of nominative prejudice.
Hands up – I am insufficiently woke…or insufficiently Woakes. Don’t be shook, it’s just my extra boomer aesthetic. Done.
Initially I thought the headline was because the pitch would make deriving entertainment from the actual cricket tricky.
It wasn’t a deliberately open to interpretation headline but always happy to achieve one, even if by accident.
I prefer pitches with more bounce and a bit less attrition, but I think this pitch should evolve over the five days and make for an intriguing contest.
As I only had limited opportunities to watch today and will be in a similar boat tomorrow, I am rather hoping for a match that does its main unfolding on Saturday and Sunday – I suspect most people around here feel similarly.
Rain too now! A multi-layered headline indeed.
Stokesy! Popey! Rabada! Test Match cricket!
Test Match: special
We’re under orders to entertain ourselves for a few days.
I have observed that the U19 World Cup has started today in South Africa. Last time that happened, 1998, England won the tournament.
That sent me on ramble of reflections about how I followed such matches back then, those 1998 players and the people I was hanging around with back then.
Rob Key is in it. So is Charley the Gent and that gang:
http://ianlouisharris.com/1998/02/01/reflections-on-the-day-england-u19s-won-the-cricket-world-cup-in-south-africa-1-february-1998/
Enjoy or ignore as you prefer.
Off the mark with a six. Then a four.
Love Mark Wood. Love ‘im.
He was on track for the fastest half century by an Englishman. Ever.
He’s simply The Bess.
Dom Bess.
Australia under 19s are opening the batting with Fraser McGurk, who doesn’t sound real at all.
Didn’t Miles Jupp play him in Ballamory?
Been up pretty much most of the night, supposedly working, but I did watch a couple of vids on my second screen whilst considering why H.E. need to remove and reinstate an entire embankment from a bridle path the runs over the M4 motorway.
Don’t know if you all saw the Crossing the Line documentary:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKcvHAec6GM
Also, there’s a book signing with Shane Warne chatting to Mike Atherton:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RH1vdm_9VcQ
Just thought I’d share, while supposedly amusing ourselves.
Why am I awaiting moderation? Didn’t I get my fake name and email address correct? Some spy I’d make!
Multiple links triggers moderation.
Sounds like that should be one of Bert’s clues.
Multiple links triggers moderation (4, 4)
Gert Rigs
(A Gert Rig is a type of chain component, one that allows a greater degree of flexibility than the normal arrangement. It was very common among Flemish hand-weavers in the late 16th Century, but it has become somewhat rare these days. I believe there is a fine example on a canal-side winch in Shrewsbury.)
Reasonable first half-hour for the tourists
Indeed, it’s been a good few minutes in England for those of us who “don’t do” sleep-in Sunday mornings. Daisy’s pumped.
Entertaining stuff from Mark Wood this afternoon.
Elgar’s pole cartwheeling and then Wood himself cartwheeling to catch de Kock…
…as it were.
Always important to grab de Kock before he gets himself in.
Indeed, twas done twice today; Sam Curren dispensed with de Kock’s pole before getting himself in this morning.
Daisy seemed more concerned about the boy Curren’s bad hair as she was with de Kock going down in such an inglorious fashion.
I’ve always found both Curren brothers to have creepy haircuts.
Another reason to back Wood.
Yes, we love Mark Wood.
Michael Holding has just talked him up, by saying that he is a bowler who “just gets on with it” – i.e. none of those “in your face” celebrations or anything like that.
Has Mikey forgotten those wonderful imaginary horse celebrations that got most of us into Mark Wood in the first place?
https://www.kingcricket.co.uk/what-mark-wood-might-be/2015/07/10/
Think there was only one time he did it as a celebration.
He mostly just used to do it in the outfield to pass the time. It was surprisingly low key.
Occasionally he’d ramp it up a bit and do some imaginary jousting with his then Durham team-mate Mark Stoneman. “I’d be the Duke of Ashington and he’d be the Earl of Sunnyside,” he said.
It sounds like he was forced into doing it as a celebration a bit as well.
Ha ha.
Given Michael Holding’s well-known enthusiasm for the horses, I’m surprised he never backed Mark Wood to win the imaginary 3.30 at Sedgefield.
Maybe he did. Maybe he’s imaginarily retired with the imaginary proceeds.
For a successful Root you need to get Wood.
Turned out to be an entertaining Test in the end! Unless you’re South African. Hopefully even the Saffer fans got something out of the lower-order boshery.
Have we won the ICC Test Championship trophy cup league mace yet?
Root gets four? What’s going on?