To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Cookies may be used for personalisation of ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Posted by 
It’s only a matter of time before The Beast attracts a sponsor’s logo
I love his multibox. Can’t say I blame him doing that; ordinary boxes don’t really provide much protection to your veg.
That was such a heart-warming video. Cricket needs more of these.
This is turning out to be a day of revelations. Here’s what I stumbled on to immediately after this video:
https://twitter.com/umIove/status/506516466666332162/photo/1
One hell of a nut case.
Is there anyone who can say things I agree with and make them sound more wrong than Ian Botham?
Is there any way I could have phrased that so I would sound more like Nick Knight?
(the first thing is in reference to this: http://www.espncricinfo.com/mcc/content/story/777715.html )
Hilariously sophisticated stuff here:
http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/775593.html
I haven’t yet worked out how the jokes work, so they must be super subtle.
Clearly the irony-missing-rabble haven’t got it yet either.
Is it all an allegory for Faf’s nads and the risk management thereof?
Didn’t think so.
I’ll keep pondering.