To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Cookies may be used for personalisation of ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Posted by 
We all know how important it is to look to the positives. England’s players and coaches have taught us this for years now.
Positives? Okay.
Judging by the picture, Colly looks disappointed. Good. Things would be somewhat worse if our One Day captain was completely delusional.
Also, Strauss’ dismissal was awesome. All of us worse-than-amateur batsmen can get out like that any time we play. It’s good to have a Test player we can relate to.
I think you’re missing the point. 1884 was a LONG time ago. 123 years infact.
On the radio this evening Hoggy was clearly miffed that it’s “silly season” before the South Africa tests, so hard for him to show form. Same for the batsmen I assume, so if there are changes then that form is going to have to already be out there save for this weeks proper county matches. There should be change, but then NEVER is even longer that 123 years ago. Tempting.
I liked (read: “was incensed by”) Duncan Fletcher’s assertion in today’s Guardian that it was “too late” to make changes to the batting order. Too late for what, exactly? Too late to order overseas Christmas presents before the Post Office deadline? Is the heat death of the universe imminent? Will Matthew Hayden rampage across Western civilisation leading his army of face-eating bears and render all selection decisions eternally moot? Heaven forfend.
(And even if he does, won’t we need just a smidgen of middle order backbone? Surely there can be no better time to call on his Robness than just before Ragnarok…)
KC, that really made me laugh!
Then I thought about it and cried.
Positives? At least we won’t have to watch them scratching around like Stevie Wonder.
This, surely, is evidence for a change in the middle order. Occupying the crease for that all important additional delivery shows clearly that Collingwood is a much better batsman than Bell so he should come in ahead of Bell!
So I suppose it’s Shah/Bop? and of course SimonC – his Bobbiness who was on Sky the day before yesterday and I have only just seen it – his cheeks are just so pinchable – bring him on NOW
Bet you Brad Hodge wishes he was English right now – poor lad will never get a long run in the Aussie middle order.
At least you Poms give your fringe players some hope. I that a “morale building” policy that has been left over from the times of Duncy Fletch? Working a charm really.
If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire…
*James Earl Jones voice*
The E-lim-in-a-tor
Just wondering, what do the England selectors actually do?
Well, apparently this is the first time since the Boer war that England have gone five tests with an unchanged lineup. This is being presented to us as some feat of stability. To my mind a “feat of stability” ought to at the very least involve some combination of balanced whirling plates and babies suspended over a pit of snakes/rabid platypuses.
Apparently, however, it really means repeatedly picking players with form problems so manifest that they’re still filling out the “sex” bit of job applications by writing “yes please.”
Either that or Graveney is planning on re-invading the Orange Free State.
Of course the line up has to stay stable! Adidas can’t have a bunch of players identified only for a hitting boundaries and scoring runs, prancing about in their kit. These would be anonymous players and not ‘as seen’ on their advertising hoardings, no one would know who they are!
Graveney has invaded the Orange Free State – that’s what he is doing now he’s no longer chairman of selectors. In a rage, he’s leading a mercenary army to sack Bloemfontein.
Not sure how he’s getting on, Cricinfo aren’t covering it.
Sportsfreak-
They try to persuade England fringe players to sign for Warwickshire, while the media completely ignores the gargantuan conflict of interest involved.
David Graveney and Mark Vermeulen. Now there’s a team.