Did you see… the butter/dragonfly that tried to run out Zak Crawley?

1. Must be pretty hard to get out of the cocoon of incompetence, if you’re incompetent.

   1. Well that’s precisely why you stay in it until you’ve metaphorphosised.

2. Alex Hartley on TMS said it was a moth.

   1. Perfectly happy to defer to Hartley’s entomological expertise.

      1. Nah, looks like a Common Bluebottle butterfly (I say this like I know, but honestly it’s the confidence born of literally five minutes on Wikipedia) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphium_sarpedon

      2. Well that’s five minutes more than most of us invested.

         Now happy to defer to Lev’s entomological expertise.

3. Isn’t it racist to assume that the butterfly/moth/Lepidoptera was Pakistani just because it was in Pakistan?

   1. Just a statistical likelihood. They only live a fortnight, so rarely travel too far.

      1. Wikipedia has an entire article on Lepidoptera migration.
         https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lepidoptera_migration

      2. Well this puts a different slant on things. Was this potentially sabotage from a tiny member of the Barmy Army?

   2. Perhaps the moth had flown out of a dusty old copy of ‘Boycott on Batting’, mistakenly packed in Harry Brook’s kitbag.

      1. You’re convinced it was a moth, aren’t you?

      2. It’s a strange hill to die on, but we all have our red lines.

      3. Always wondered why everyone has to die on a hill. What’s wrong with a valley?

   3. Did you miss an opportunity to crowbar some “creepy Crawley” pun in there, or did you just decide it was beneath you?

      1. Very little is beneath us, Darren. We’ll be in a deep, deep valley the day we die – which is what we feel like doing now in the wake of that tragically missed opportunity.

4. To put to death all stringy allusions to the identity of the insect, I, as a professional entomologist, shall put to rest all conjecture.

   The insect is clearly a butterfly, so KC’s identification skills are laudable. Judging by ‘jizz’, an RAF colloquialism and subsequently a birding term to describe general appearance and behaviour, it appears to be a Nymphalid (readers may be familiar with Red Admirals and Peacocks that belong to the same family). Of the Pakistani Nymphalids, and indeed butterflies in general, it very strongly resembles a nawab sp., Polyura sp. It could be a Common Nawab Polyura athamas for example. However, I am not overly familiar with the distribution and habitat requirements of Polyura in eastern Pakistan, and some species are similar in appearance when seen c.100 metres away, so I shall just limit my identification skills to genus.

   Please note that in accordance to English grammar and scientific nomenclature, the latin (scientific) names should be italicized, but the comments section tools are lacking so I am unable to be completely grammatically correct.

   1. Are you sure they’re lacking?

      1. Oh it works! In case we have somehow offended the butterflies, and in revenge they start interfering with our work tasks too, I’ll write it as ’twas intended: Polyura. Once correctly italicised, it no longer looks so much like the brand name for a plastics manufacturer. I hope the butterflies are appeased.

         (Some HTML tags work, in case you’re wondering.)

      2. Now happy to defer to Buttface’s entomological expertise.

      3. Ah, thank you Bail-out. I shall now look into that…

         Hopefully this worked.

   2. Do I detect nominative determinism at play here, Buttface? My bad for mistakenly assuming that the name “Buttface” alluded to a Brydon-like visage, rather than profound expertise on nymphalids.

      This article and thread of comments is well up there in the canon of KC geeky pages, a place where there is quite a lot of serious competition for the top spot.

      1. Well Ged, that nominative determinism would explain quite a bit. Actually, quite a lot thinking about it.

         …but I like to take on an appearance that leads people to under-estimate my vast abilities, to rise like a super-hero from the shadows to save the world and let mere mortals to bask in my glory such as in the case of the identification of the Polyura sp. above.

         *My thanks to Bail-out for discovering the wonders of HTML tags. I shall use these powerful new weapons tools with care.

5. Some Proper Test Cricket occuring this morning in Multan and Bengaluru

   1. I missed the epic India collapse. One of the problems of having two test matches being played at the same time. U+1F641

      1. Well, that didn’t work 🙁

      2. That’s better 🙂

6. Is that [i]the[/i] Lev Parikian? Or just a fiendishly cunning imposter?

   1. Hmmmm tml… That didn’t work

      1. You’re after these guys… <>><, not these []][.

   2. I only do two of the three main (public) things Mr Parikian does, so less fiendishly cunning than you give me credit.

      1. Think that comment was directed at the person writing under the name “Lev Parikian” further up.

         You can blame the site’s comment threading functionality for the misunderstanding.

      2. And now everyone’s wondering what you/I get up to in private.

      3. @KC. Ahh, bu**er. Yes, confused by the birding reference.

      4. @Lev the imposter (maybe). What we do in private stays private 😉

         …and apologies for taking credit for being the said imposter (maybe). I queried the relevance in the back of my mind, but the birding reference overtly beguiled me and lead me down the wrong path to humiliate me :-(. Such is the way of KC’s comment threading functionality as KC pointed out above.

         …but at least I/you know there is at least one other birder on here. 🙂

   3. Yes hello it’s me, although that is exactly what a fiendishly cunning impostor would say.

7. I am now hugely>i< confused

   Enjoyed Into The Tangled Bank very much, Mr P/fiendishly cunning imposter.

   1. Dammit.

Comments are closed.