To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Cookies may be used for personalisation of ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Posted by 
Can’t say i’m not a little disappointed you didn’t attach an amusing picture with this post KC.
Surely you could come up with something for this?
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/45271000/jpg/_45271236_bell_patel_pepsi416.jpg
That’s so much better than what we would have used.
He could have taken some coaching from Arjuna Ranatunga.
That might be Ian Bell with him in thast photograph. On the other hand, it might not. I’m indifferent to whether it is or not.
And on the subject of indifference to Ian Bell, had he survived a further 11 balls yesterday afternoon, I might have had a fundamental shift of views about him.
As it was, he almost played a match winning innings but then ultimately tried to flush it all down the toily at the 59th minute of the 11th hour. So I am bewildered back to an indifferent position, as always.
Whoops should have realised there would be a Bell piece up by now – darned e-mail alert thingie always best part of a day behind – I’ve switched the above comment to the right posting.
Still, a good comment is worth making twice and I think the tenuous link between Patel and Bell was worth having.
What’s a good time for the email? We never know.
It only goes out once every 24 hours, so if it’s a two-post day one’s always going to be late.
Maybe a bit pedantic Ged, but I think you meant the 59th minute of the 12th hour?