To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Cookies may be used for personalisation of ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Posted by 
Dan actually means the non-Abelian group — and he means multiplication not addition. You see, in these theories the operation of multiplication is not commutative: a*b is not the same as b*a.
I might have missed Dan’s point though which was something about Steve Waugh or someone.
Also, the name “Liebke and Bowden” is crying out for a much-awaited sitcom that ends up getting canceled after one season.
Starring Brian Blessed and Patrick Stewart.
I decided to be angry with this one. I don’t think that Steve Smith warranted four out of six ridiculous points. Three maximum. Two would have been my mark for him.
You can’t have the same fellow top score with the bat and top score with ridiculousness. That is illogical to the point of being ridiculous…ah!
I think Liebke & Bowden ought to have been a men’s doubles partnership from the 1970s. One of those pairings that just missed out to the likes of Newcombe & Roche, Hewitt & McMillan, McNamara & McNamee (I’m not making these up)…
https://images.app.goo.gl/N4K4vDuKgD9sZCDU9
Liebke would have been the one with the antipodean tash…obvs.